Oct 29 2007

Dane Cook on Atheism

OK, so my wife and I were browsing youtube for some entertainment (we’re cheap and don’t have cable) when we decided to look for some Dane Cook. We came across this video (ironically) at the same time that I was having an interesting conversation on de-Conversion on a post called “Where was God on 9/11.”  I won’t lie, the conversation had a me a little perturbed to have my Christian beliefs dismissed so quickly as illogical, silly, “twisted,” “pathetic,” etc.  I don’t care if you disagree with my conclusions, that’s fine!  But to be so quickly dismissed and labeled was more than a little frustrating.  It was kind of ironic that it is Christians that are often (rightfully) seen as judgmental or lacking empathy and understanding for the beliefs of others.

Anyway, considering that conversation, this video made me laugh hysterically. Dane Cook is irreverent, but hilarious, and he uses humor to make a really really good freaking point about atheism (or at least some versions of it) and the kind of assumptions we carry with our beliefs. It kind of puts the shoe on the other foot, so to speak. Holy crap… so funny… Enjoy!

(Disclaimer: The following video is meant to be humorous. It is not intended to make sweeping generalizations or disrespect anyone’s personal beliefs.)

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wts-dntnyh4]


Oct 01 2007

american justice

 cthomas.jpg

I’ve sometimes heard that with respect to public figures, the established stereotype is far from how they actually are as a person.  In American politics, there are few people as polarizing as Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas.  Just mentioning his name may make you think of what you think about him.  It certainly does to me.  Liberals hate him.  Many African Americans misunderstand him.  But who is he?

Thomas recently wrote his memoirs titled My Grandfather’s Son, and also recently sat down for a fascinating interview with 60 Minutes.  This is possibly his first interview of this depth he’s given since the U.S. Senate approved him to the Supreme Court.

He discusses many aspects of his life, including time spent studying at a Roman Catholic seminary.  He later left the seminary due to how he perceived the school’s indifference to civil rights issues, but came back to his faith later in as an adult.  I wish they had spent more time on this, but with so many other topics to consider in his life, it’s understandable.

I won’t spoil the rest of the interview, but it is an intriguing look at someone that so many carry opinions about, but few actually know.  Regardless of how you feel about him, you will be better informed for watching this.  See for yourself, and tell me what you think after watching it.

Part One

Part Two

Part Three


Sep 24 2007

dta

It’s been about 50 years since the U.S. began printing ‘In God We Trust’ onto the currency. This occurred during the Eisenhower administration to further accentuate the difference between America and the then-Soviet Union. That form of communism suppressed religion a great deal. We wanted any advantage out there.

This Cold War relic has held on though, despite challenges that that this phrase violates separation of church and state. As a Christian, I admit I do not empathize well with those who oppose this. I am somewhat bemused by notions that this moves the U.S. toward being a theocracy. More abrasive defenders of this have argued the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. While that’s a good slogan, I’m not sure how much that helps foster reconcilation.

(Strangely enough, Protestants are commonly thought of as pushing for a theocracy, though world history shows that either Jews (Israel) or Roman Catholics have been in the habit of establishing theocracies, not Protestants.  But no matter.)

Should we continue to carry this message on our currency? Does it even serve a purpose? An article here examines the history of this controversial phrase. Enjoy!











      THE SEMINARIAN WAGER
    
Everyone has faith. Regardless of how our faith developed, we should be willing to critically analyze those beliefs. While analyzing the validity of our faith, we should also be willing to analyze the validity of our doubts and cultural preconditions. If we are willing to do this, we wager that over time, the roots of our faith will strengthen toward truth, and will not be uprooted during challenging times. This site aims to provide worthwhile discussion regarding a critical evaluation of both religious belief and modern doubts.