Mar 07 2008

It’s Raining Cats and Dogs…Run For Your Lives!!!

cat-falling.jpg

Consider this fictitious journal entry:

“I had a horrible day today.  This morning I lost my job.  I went out to lunch with my girlfriend, and when I began telling her about it, she interrupted me and told me she wanted to break up.  On my way home from that wonderful lunch, I lost control of my car and spun off the road into a ditch.  To make matters worse, it was raining cats and dogs.” Read more »


Feb 28 2008

Why Do I Care?

telegram.jpg

In a conversation on De-Conversion, Pat (comment #15) said

“I would like to see a post on your blog as to why someone would follow God.”

This is a very good question and one that needs to be asked by Christians and non-Christians alike, but often goes unaddressed in Christian circles. I will endeavor to provide a generic answer to the question here. However, before we can start to answer why someone would follow God, there are a lot of underlying assumptions about God and our knowledge of Him that we must first address. By doing so not only will we all be on the same page regarding certain terms and concepts, but we will be able to follow the logic used (hopefully) in answering this question from start to finish. Read more »


Nov 28 2007

Magic Eye

dino.jpg 

 

Disclaimer: this post is an explanation of Ether Meek’s thesis in her book Longing to Know.  Most of the examples are taken from this book as well.

 

I have dealt with knowing in my two earlier posts about the need for certainty and the three epistemic options.  Meek offers this new definition: “Knowing is the responsible human struggle to rely on clues, to focus on a coherent pattern, and submit to its reality.”

 

Meek argues that knowing is a three step process.  First, we look at clues.  Then we struggle to looks through the clues, and finally we integrate the clues.  Confusing?  Let’s look at an example.  Think of those “magic eyes.”  One is shown above.  You are supposed to look at this 2D image and somehow you are able to see something in 3D.  Knowing is like coming to see this 3D image.  We are given a list of clues to how to see this image (http://www.magiceye.com/faq_example.htm).  Then we try to do it ourselves.  For the longest time I couldn’t get the stupid thing Read more »


Nov 19 2007

Three Epistemic Options and Garden State

garden-state.jpg

In my last post, I tried to outline how the need for certainty leads us to believe we cannot know anything at all. The bar many of us set for truth is so high nothing seems to be able to pass it. Sometimes it seems reason leads us to believe there is no reason (in the old model’s definition). So what the heck do we do with this?

We really only have three options. We can stay in the old model. We can admit that nothing can be known (what I call epistemic nihilism). Or we can scrape the old model and save knowledge.
Read more »











      THE SEMINARIAN WAGER
    
Everyone has faith. Regardless of how our faith developed, we should be willing to critically analyze those beliefs. While analyzing the validity of our faith, we should also be willing to analyze the validity of our doubts and cultural preconditions. If we are willing to do this, we wager that over time, the roots of our faith will strengthen toward truth, and will not be uprooted during challenging times. This site aims to provide worthwhile discussion regarding a critical evaluation of both religious belief and modern doubts.